Seminar Three
Warfare, genocide and ethnic conflict
Preventing war and genocide
The psychoanalyst Vamik Volkan has spent much of his professional life studying ethnic and political strife in the Middle East. He has taught arbitration and conflict resolution to cultural and political leaders, using his skills as a psychoanalyst in a group setting. In Killing in the Name of Identity he wrote:
Despite some pessimism about human nature, especially as itis manifested in large groups, I believed that we could be successful incertain areas of international conflict if we were to spend extended periods of time—as a psychoanalyst spends years in treating an analysand—opening dialogues between enemies and providing actual examples of peaceful coexistence… I knew we could not change human nature in general, but perhaps we could manage to tame massive aggression in certain locations.
In an earlier book Blood Lines: From Ethnic Pride to Ethnic Terrorism, Volkan wrote that most Jewish people share a legacy “to never forget,” and he asked the poignant question: “How do members of a group adaptively mourn past losses… so that they do not induce feelings of anger, humiliation, and the desire for revenge?”
Although Volkan's studies and teaching reflect a state-of-the-art understanding of warfare and ethnic conflict, not once in his books have I found a discussion of evolutionary aspects of human behavior. He covers cultural, developmental, and psychoanalytic aspects of the we-they tendency inherent in human nature, but fails to address the critical need of understanding human nature in a fundamentally biological light.
How did a we-they tendency evolve and become so powerful? Has it had Darwinian adaptive value over the course of our evolution? If so, at what level(s) of selection did it evolve—gene, individual, and/or group?
Much has been written about how to intervene in ethnic conflicts—how to stop genocide from escalating and “spilling out of control”—but the challenge is like sweeping back the ocean with a broom. If we wait until feelings are at the breaking point we have mostly lost the chance to intervene by arbitration. Instead,I would argue that we are “missing the boat” in the search for a solution to genocide.


